Help Support the Blog

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Buddhi-yoga... continued



Bhagavad-Gita Explained

Chapter Two:
Atma-jñāna

by Michael Dolan/B.V. Mahayogi




True wisdom about the atma will discover the bhakti principle of dedication. This principle is explained as follows:

अन्याभिलसित-शुन्यं ज्ञान-कर्माद्य् अनावृतम्
आनुकूल्येन कृष्णानुशीलनं भक्तिर् उच्यते

anyābhilasita-śunya jñāna karmādy anāvtam
ānukūlyena kṛṣṇānuśīlana bhaktir ucyate

Bhakti means dedication to the sweet absolute, Kṛṣṇa, Reality the Beautiful. Divine love is untainted by karma or jñāna. True dedication, in other words, is free from both the tendency for either exploitation or renunciation. It is unconditional surrender to the Personality of Godhead.

The word buddhi in Sanskrit means intelligent. Gautama became famous as the Buddha or the intelligent one."

 Here, true wisdom or buddhi, is stressed by Kṛṣṇa as an essential aspect of his teaching.

Kṛṣṇa says,

व्य्वसात्मिक बुद्धिर्, एकेह कुरु-नन्दन
बहु-शाखा ह्य् अनन्ताश्च बुद्धयोऽव्यवसायिनाम्
vyvasātmika buddhir, ekeha kuru-nandana
bahu-śākhā hy anantāś cha, buddhayo ‘vyavasāyinām
BG 2.41

This path of wisdom is for those whose intelligence is fixed and does not waver. Only one whose intelligence is focused on the true nature of atma will progress on this path, O son of the Kurus. Whereas those who cannot focus will lose their intelligence in the unlimited branches of material knowledge, such as those found in the Vedas.

It may seem strange that Kṛṣṇa is taking a moment to criticize so-called Vedic knowledge. But his point with Arjuna is to focus on the eternal. Many branches of knowledge promote materialistic outcomes. The Vedic knowledge deals with everything from sex in the Kama-sutra to war in the Dhanur-Veda, to medicine in the Ayur-Veda and astrology in the Jyoti-shastra. Here, Kṛṣṇa is not condemning the knowledge of the Vedas, but pointing out that as we become attached to the material world, we tend to focus on superficial knowledge. This focus on material things vitiates our focus on our true spiritual self.

As our mind and intelligence become more involved in material life, forgetting our true self, we become obsessed with the details of material well-being and take shelter of scriptural conclusions that uphold our point of view. Arjuna wants to avoid the conflict and he quotes scripture to Kṛṣṇa to support his cowardice. Kṛṣṇa is reminding him that many aspects of scripture are useful in supporting every day life, but misleading in terms of self-realization.

He says, The less informed are often deluded by the flowery words of scripture. These supposed followers of the Vedas look for power, good karma, a high birth, even heaven. Misled by the pomp and circumstance of rituals and ceremonies, they fail to see their real self-interest.


To avoid some of the difficult turns of phrase found in the Sanskrit, we might paraphrase Krishnas argument as follows:


Try to understand the object of the scriptures, Arjuna. By understanding the purpose behind the Vedas you will grasp the meaning of the individual texts. Common people ignorant of the meaning of the Vedas like the sweet words that promise good karma. They dont understand that the inner meaning of scripture is the attainment of the Supreme Truth. The little injunctions of the scripture are local ideas. The big idea is surrender to divinity. The scriptural details about karma are like small wells in the desert where some water may be found. We find some relief from thirst. But this is limited.

A well may give some water, but a vast lake satisfies all the purposes of a small well. Know the infinite. Knowing that, everything is known. Getting that, everything is gotten. Following mundane scriptural injunctions, rituals, and ceremonies may help us in this world, but by following social religion and the flowery words of the Vedas we lose sight of the higher goal.

Seek out the proper wisdom about the atma and the Higher Self. Fix your intelligence there. When we are too much involved in this world our intelligence becomes lost in trivia. When we allow the mind to become seduced by the idea of enjoying the senses we lose ourselves. Proper enlightenment is called samādhi which means fixed mind. But samādhi becomes impossible when the world is too much with us. As long as we are interested in enjoying this world we can never attain enlightenment.

The Vedas are really concerned with the threefold aspects of this worldly subjective illusion. But you, Arjuna, must become free from these distractions. Become fixed in proper yoga and free yourself from illusion.”[1]
-->



नेहाभिक्रमनाशोस्ति प्रत्यवायो न विद्यते
स्वल्पम् अप्य् अस्य धर्मस्य त्रायते महतो भयात्
२.४०
nehābhikramanāśosti pratyavāyo na vidyate
svalpam apy asya dharmasya trāyate mahato bhayāt
2.40

व्यवसायात्मिका बुद्धिर् एकेह कुरुनन्दन
बहुशाखा ह्य् अनन्ताश् च बुद्धयोव्यवसायिनाम् २.४१
vyavasāyātmikā buddhir ekeha kurunandana
bahuśākhā hy anantāś ca buddhayovyavasāyinām 2.41


याम् इमां पुष्पितां वाचं प्रवदन्त्य् अविपश्चितः
वेदवादरताः पार्थ नान्यद् अस्तीति वादिनः २.४२
yām imāṃ puṣpitāṃ vācaṃ pravadanty avipaścitaḥ
vedavādaratāḥ pārtha nānyad astīti vādinaḥ 2.42


कामात्मानः स्वर्गपरा जन्मकर्मफलप्रदाम्
क्रियाविशेषबहुलां भोगैश्वर्यगतिं प्रति २.४३
kāmātmānaḥ svargaparā janmakarmaphalapradām
kriyāviśeṣabahulāṃ bhogaiśvaryagatiṃ prati 2.43


भोगैश्वर्यप्रसक्तानां तयापहृतचेतसाम्
व्यवसायात्मिका बुद्धिः समाधौ न विधीयते २.४४
bhogaiśvaryaprasaktānāṃ tayāpahṛtacetasām
vyavasāyātmikā buddhiḥ samādhau na vidhīyate 2.44


त्रैगुण्यविषया वेदा निस्त्रैगुण्यो भवार्जुन
निर्द्वन्द्वो नित्यसत्वस्थो निर्योगक्षेम आत्मवान् २.४५
traiguṇyaviṣayā vedā nistraiguṇyo bhavārjuna
nirdvandvo nityasatvastho niryogakṣema ātmavān 2.45


यावान् अर्थ उदपाने सर्वतः संप्लुतोदके
तावान् सर्वेषु वेदेषु ब्राह्मणस्य विजानतः २.४६
yāvān artha udapāne sarvataḥ saṃplutodake
tāvān sarveṣu vedeṣu brāhmaṇasya vijānataḥ 2.46











Monday, March 11, 2019

Buddhi-yoga


Bhagavad-Gita Explained

Chapter Two:
Atma-jñāna

by Michael Dolan/B.V. Mahayogi



Bhagavad-Gita Chapter 2 continued... March 11, 2019


-->


Ancient Dialogues 

It is useful to keep in mind that for all its philosophical rigor, the Bhagavad-Gita is not a doctoral thesis or an academic paper. It is ancient conversation recorded long before the talks of Socrates were edited into dialogues by Plato. Krishna advises his friend while Arjuna anxiously eyes the warriors lined up against him. They talk while armed men race about in chariots blowing war-trumpets. We may not expect an entirely disciplined discourse, footnoted for scholars. And yet, Krishnas arguments follow a logical framework. Here in the second chapter Krishna lays the ground for the points that follow.


First Principles

His first teaching is important. He tells Arjuna to try to see things from a wider perspective: from the point of view of eternity.
The soul is immortal. All wisdom will flow from this. Krishna will uncover different levels of surrender to divinity culminating in complete dedication. But he wants Arjuna to explore the spiritual dimension first. This echoes the Vedanta-sutras athāto-brahma-jijñāsa: The human form of life is meant for inquiring into the nature of self; it is a gift for discovering spiritual reality. Soon we will discover a higher principle--that of divinity or God.


Bhagavad Gita and Theism


The Bhagavad-Gita is a profoundly monotheistic work. The word Bhagavan means God. In the course of the work we discover that Krishna claims divinity for Himself. It will be revealed that God may be understood as the Supreme Person. The inner meaning of the Mahābharata is seen in the Bhagavad-Gita which reveals Krishna as the Supreme Absoute Truth. Some may be uncomfortable with the insistence upon Krishna as God, but if we suspend our critical judgment long enough to enter into the teachings given here, we may learn something useful that helps our own faith. Anyone reading the Bible must accept that the Old Testament describes God as Yahweh. In order to truly enter the spirit of the Bhagavad-Gita we must likewise accept Krishna as Bhagavan at least for the duration of our reading.


Why God Appears

According to the text, when the earth was over-populated with tyrants and burdened by the weight of military might, God Himself appeared in the Krishna-avatar to diminish the burden by eliminating those puissant kings. The battle of Kurukshetra was to be their extinction. Krishna has empowered Arjuna with the task of removing such demonic kings.
And so Krishna asks Arjuna not only to do his duty as a soldier but to fight as an act of dedication to God Himself, the Supreme Person.
The idea of dedication to God is called Bhakti or divine love and bhakti is the true inner meaning of the Gita. Krishna will discuss in turn different religious practices, different concepts of duty, and distinct forms of yoga. Arjuna is rightly concerned with death. If he dies in battle, having murdered cousins, uncles, gurus, and grandfathers, perhaps he might go to hell. Before riding in to battle, he has questions: What is the standard of proper behavior? How does karma affect us? What is the right path?


Spiritual Wisdom: Buddhi-yoga

Krishna will answer his questions in due course, but he begins with the idea of spiritual wisdom. On the basis of spiritual wisdom we will come to the right conclusions about action. Krishna explains that such wisdom will ultimately lead one to see the value of dedication, bhakti.
The Buddha taught that right thinking and knowledge are key to proper vision, action, meditation and enlightenment. Krishna tells us that wisdom and a proper understanding of the soul are key to determining our true self-interest as spiritual entities: eternal dedication to divinity in love or bhakti.
He will go on to describe different kinds of processes that lead to self-realization and freedom from birth and death. He will talk of different yogas but at the heart of all these yogic processes is what he dubs here in the second chapter: buddhi-yoga.

Bhaktivinod Thakura has commented that Krishnas teaching will show that real wisdom--buddhi-yoga--is the central guiding principle behind all the other yogas described in the Gita. When the path of wisdom is limited by good deeds or intellectual knowledge it is karma-yoga, sakhya or jñāna-yoga. But true wisdom discovers the bhakti principle of dedication. This is the purport of buddhi-yoga and supercedes all other forms of yoga:  The highest wisdom is found in surrender and divine love--bhakti. 

Sunday, March 10, 2019

La Ciencia del Atma


-->


Bhagavad-Gita
Capítulo Dos
La Ciencia del Atma
Por Michael Dolan/ B.V. Mahāyogi
Traducido por Teresa Loret de Mola, Tapanandini DD



A medida que el diálogo entre Kṛṣṇa y Arjuna avanza, Arjuna se preocupa de lo que ha de hacer. Ante la guerra inminente, quiere saber cuál es su posición ética.
Todos encaramos decisiones similares cotidianamente. ¿Qué es correcto e incorrecto? La filosofía occidental le llama “ética” a esto. En términos de la religión occidental es pecado o piedad. Ante la ley las acciones legales o ilegales. En la sociedad lo correcto e incorrecto, bien y mal, será incierto, dependiendo de la cultura. Algunos dicen que todo esto es relativo.
Los pensadores occidentales se basan en las tradiciones filosóficas y religiosas. Asi miden las teologías y mitologías extranjeras.  Incluso los estudios comparativos de religiones nos obligan a ver otros puntos de vista a través del lente de los pensadores occidentales
Y, sin embargo, oriente tiene un punto de vista muy distinto. El Mahābhārata, por ejemplo, está lleno de discusiones acerca del karma y el dharma, pero las ideas son algo diferentes de la visión occidental del bien y del mal. La cristiandad, por ejemplo, pretende que sólo tenemos una vida para vivir, y que cualquier acción equivocada nos puede conducir hacia la condenación eterna en el infierno. Esta doctrina de la condenación eterna es esencial para los fundadores de la Iglesia Católica. El alma también no es necesariamente eterna. La vida eterna está supeditada a aceptar a Cristo como el salvador personal. La forma oriental es diferente. En términos occidentales hablamos de acción ética y deberes religiosos, pero en términos orientales estos son llamados karma y dharma.
Pero incluso antes de tocar temas prácticos como la acción correcta, karma y dharma, la primera enseñanza de Kṛṣṇa a Arjuna es ontológica. Su discusión acerca del alma tiene importancia trascendental. Antes de hablar del karma, Kṛṣṇa explica que el alma es eterna, a pesar de la propia preferencia religiosa. Es la naturaleza constitucional del atma. Antes de discutir acerca del dharma en su posición ética, Kṛṣṇa nos habla acerca del dharma de la propia alma. Dharma en realidad significa “lo que nos sostiene” “lo que nos mantiene unidos”. Podemos decir que el dharma del azúcar es ser dulce. Si el azúcar no tiene dulzura ya no es azúcar. Así que cuál es el dharma del alma: existencia eterna en la dicha, sat-cit-ananda.
Pero Arjuna está preocupado acerca de lo que mantiene unida a la sociedad. No le inquieta la espiritualidad. Quiere entender el dharma en términos de deber. Si “lo que hacemos,” “para lo que vivimos”, “nos sostiene y nos une”, Arjuna quiere saber qué hacer y cómo vivir. Falla al ver la importancia de las enseñanzas de Kṛṣṇa acerca del alma. Hablar del alma es abstracto. Quiere un consejo concreto, no abstracciones ontológicas.
¿Entonces, qué son karma y dharma?
Normalmente se piensa en karma en términos de reacciones negativas, pero karma no es una mera reacción, es un rango entero de causa-efecto, y consecuencias. La acción o karma puede ser ética o antiética,  buena o mala, de acuerdo a si dicha acción es acorde con el deber, las leyes de la sociedad, las convenciones bíblicas o las normas y tradiciones culturales.
La dicotomía es arcaica. Platón insiste en un mundo ideal mientras que Aristóteles se enfoca en un mundo práctico. En la pintura de Rafael, “La Escuela de Atenas”, vemos a un Platón sabio y anciano que apunta a los cielos y a su discípulo Aristóteles señalando con las palmas hacia abajo que hay que mantenernos pisando tierra.
Conforme Kṛṣṇa enseña que no se puede controlar el medio ambiente a la fuerza, uno primero debe dominar el propio desarrollo espiritual, Arjuna argumenta por la posición ética en este mundo. Como veremos, los dos no se excluyen mutuamente. Pero una relación sana del guru con el discípulo ha de dejar espacio para discutir así como observamos en el diálogo entre Kṛṣṇa y Arjuna.
Pero como maestro Kṛṣṇa no es insensible a las necesidades de su estudiante. Anticipando su argumento, Kṛṣṇa regresa al problema ético del cómo actuar.
Tras explicar que el alma es eterna y que no puede ser asesinada, Kṛṣṇa señala que no hay necesidad de lamentarse. La pena es natural, pero Arjuna puede llorar más tarde. Ha de cumplir con su deber de guerrero, ya que está en la obligación de actuar; de hecho nada le dará mayor gloria que el morir en la batalla, o la infamia mayor de rehuir a la acción. Esa será la verdadera posición ética para Arjuna y su mejor acción kármica.  
Hay algo de superficialidad aquí como podremos ver más tarde, El deber o dharma tiene un significado más profundo. El deber hacia la familia, la sociedad, la patria, tal vez ayudan a encontrar protección al seguir el código de conducta. Pero hay un aspecto del dharma mucho más elevado, el deber hacia el interés del propio ser espiritual. Así que antes de entrar en una discusión del deber material de uno mismo, Kṛṣṇa le enseña que la percatación espiritual va primero.
Entonces el dharma, tiene dos aspectos: nuestro deber relativo hacia la familia, la sociedad, el país y los códigos de conducta tradicionales y el deber absoluto hacia uno mismo y hacia el propio Dios.
Arjuna tiene un dilema práctico. No está muy interesado en una discusión ontológica. Quiere limitar el debate a una discusión de valores más relativos.
En ese contexto, Kṛṣṇa le aconseja, “Cumple tu deber como guerrero” Pero Kṛṣṇa le señala acerca de la necesidad de un entendimiento más profundo: “Reconócete a ti mismo primero como un espíritu, un atma, como alma eterna.”
Toda otra acción ha de estar precedida de esta sabiduría.