Help Support the Blog

Thursday, August 31, 2017

Physical Pain and Spiritual Joy

Reflections on the Compassionate Buddha





by Michael Dolan, B.V. Mahāyogi


The teachings of the compassionate Buddha are remarkably apt for the modern world. Scientists and intellectuals are “discovering” his ancient teaching and claiming it for their own. Much oriental wisdom had been discounted since the time of Hegel as primitive and “fatalistic.” But with the new atheism of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris people are struggling to balance faith with the agnosticism inherent in science.
Buddha does not require any faith. The Compassionate Buddha merely states the facts: you’re suffering. What are you going to do about it?
If God doesn’t exist, if there is no afterlife and no soul, then enlightenment means accepting the inevitable dissolution of the ego as a natural conclusion. Grief is unnatural.
Given that the soul doesn’t exist, perhaps Buddhism is the best and most humanistic of all wisdom, a perfect fit for a society that believes in nothing. Science tells us that the universe came from nothing and that nothing is sacred. Nothing has meaning. It is only natural to accept as a religious philosophy the idea that everything ends in nothing and that perfect knowledge goes nowhere, that is: it leads us into nirvana.



A celebrated member of the “Lost Generation” Ernest Hemingway, wrote a story of emotional darkness and existential angst in A Clean Well-lighted Place. It is almost closing time in a restaurant. A man comes in to drink. He likes the place because it is clean and well-lit. He can indulge his taste for alcohol and self-destruction in a place that will not promote his tendency for suicide. One of the waiters wants to close up and go home. The other waiter, a bit more experienced has compassion for the old man. He shares the old man’s understanding of the meaninglessness of the world which he sums up in the nada prayer. Nada of course means “nothing.” Hemingway’s nada prayer sums up not only the emptiness felt by his generation after the futility of the first great war; it is as good an explanation of the Buddha’s teaching as you may find anywhere in the annals of the Dalai Lama. Here is the nada prayer by Ernest Hemingway. Keep in mind that nada means nothing.

"Hail nothing, full of nothing, nothing is with thee..."

“Our nada who art in nada, nada be thy name; thy kingdom nada thy will be nada; in nada as it is in nada. Give us this nada our daily nada and nada us our nada as we nada our nadas and nada us not into nada but deliver us from nada; pues nada. Hail nothing full of nothing, nothing is with thee.”
If the soul doesn’t exist; If God doesn’t exist, then nothing has meaning. The followers of Buddha are adept at exploring the meaning of nothing, of elevating nothing to perfection. The greatest teachers of the path have realized a perfect view of nothing, the resolve to commit to nothing, ethical living that ends in nothing, meditation on nothing that leads to being equipoised in the void. “Our nada who art in nada...”
In a meaningless world where nothing is all we have, it makes sense to believe in nothing, to exalt nothing to the level of religion.
Buddhism offers solace from suffering by helping us to embrace nothing. Buddha’s analysis is incredibly powerful. He anoints suffering as the greatest of all truths.
But his analysis is flawed. Life is filled with suffering, it is true. But becoming free from suffering is not the only motivation found in human life. We live not to avoid pain, but to have joy.
And the greatest joy comes from sacrifice. Parents sacrifice everything for their children. This morning I read how in the recent hurricane in Houston, a young mother sacrificed her life to save her daughter. They found her floating facedown, her baby strapped to her back, still alive. During the siege of Leningrad, while millions starved to death, 12 heroes guarded the largest collection of seeds and grains in the world at the Pavlovsk seed bank. The seeds in their bank would preserve different strains of wheat and rice and prevent future world famine.


Alexander Stchukin was a specialist in peanuts. He died protecting tons of peanuts, wheat grains, and rice that could easily have saved his and his fellow workers lives.
The scientists at the Pavlovsk seed bank, charged with maintaining biodiverstiy chose to starve, ensuring that future generations of Russians could eat, free from the threat of plagues and blight. Sacrifice is painful, but renders a greater satisfaction than anaesthesia or the avoidance of pain.
Suffering is part of life; no pain, no gain. Where there is no struggle there can be no advancement. Avoidance of suffering as a philosophy seeks to solve the problem of pain. This is mere anaesthesia. Heroin and opioid addiction has become a pressing problem. Opium is probably the most addictive drug in existence. Why? It is the best anaesthesia. Opium is the best painkiller. Marx once defined Religion as “The Opium of the masses.” In 2017, Opium is the Opium of the masses. As a painkiller, it is superior even to the teachings of the Buddha, who defined pain as the main problem of existence.
But pain is not the highest truth, according to the Vaishnava teachers. Above pain is joy, ecstasy, bliss. And bliss is the birthright of all who have teh human form of life. Bliss is an essential component of the human soul, beyond mere existence. Those who deny the existence of the soul can never realize complete joy. Having negated even the prospect of joy, their only prospect is painkilling, escaping suffering. But anaesthesia is a limited response to the problem of pain and suffering. The pro-active response is to discover joy through sacrifice and dedication.
The greatest historical example of sacrifice is found in the life of Jesus Christ. If suffering in this life is terrible, the suffering promised in the afterlife for those who are sinful is even greater. From bad karma to the fires of hell, many conceptions of the afterlife are negative. Christ’s sacrifice was such that he took the sins of the world upon his head that we would not need to face the flames of hell. Christ’s example is not that of negation of pain. If, in the Garden of Gethsemane, he had a moment of doubt and begged his father in Heaven, “Take this cup from my lips,” his faith was such that he accepted the sacrifice. So it is that the true purport of Buddha’s philosophy of compassion is found in sacrifice.

Two thousand years after Christ, the great sacrifice of the iron age of suffering is seen in the vibration of the holy name. The vibration of the holy name can truly free the soul, delivering us from the pain of human suffering and transport us to the realm of divine love and ecstasy.

As Śrīla Prabhupāda explains this in Elevation to Krishna Consciousness.
“Caitanya Mahaprabhu introduced the chanting of Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare/ Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare as a great means of propaganda for spreading love of God. It is not that it is recommended only for Kali-yuga. Actually, it is recommended for every age. There have always been many devotees who have chanted and reached perfection in all ages. That is the beauty of this Krsna consciousness movement. It is not simply for one age, or for one country, or for one class of people. Hare Krsna can be chanted by any man in any social position, in any country and in any age, for Krsna is the Supreme Lord of all people in all social positions, in all countries, in all ages.”



Tuesday, August 29, 2017

The Path of Englightenment


The Eightfold Path of Yoga, Eightfold Noble Path of Buddha, and the Ninefold Path of Surrender:

By Michael Dolan, B.V. Mahayogi
Steps to Self-Realization

The Bhagavad Gita and Yoga Sutras of Patanjali        
Yoga is popular nowadays. In your local supermarket you will find advertisements for everything from integral yoga to naked yoga, flying yoga, even dancing yoga.
The word “Yoga” is interesting. In a sense, it really means “to join,” since the root of the word in Sanskrit is yoj. The English word “yoke” is derived from the same root as is yojana, the Vedic unit of measure which literally means a “day’s journey by oxen.” The oxen are yoked together in a team. So joining or union. Any practice which advances our union with divinity is a form of yoga.
Karma, jñāna, aṣṭāṇga and bhakti. These are the four approaches to divinity.

Practicing "Good Karma" or Right Action is a form of Yoga

Karma-yoga attempts to realize salvation through perfect action. One who knows the laws of cause and effect, of action and reaction realizes that bad action has consequences and seeks to purify action by avoiding sin and accepting piety. One strives for perfection through proper action and good deeds. Ethical action is the basis of many religions.
Ethical action or "good karma" is the basis of many religions
Others find that karma is superficial. Action alone will not gain salvation. The soul exists on a plane above the material forces of action and reaction. Spiritual knowledge is required for a more perfect union with God. Such a yoga path is called jñāna, or knowledge.

Jñāna or knowledge is another form of Yoga practice

 In English, the word gnosis is close to the meaning of jñāna (pronounced gyan). Bhakti is the yoga recommended by Krishna as the Supreme Yoga. He explains that it is through love of God that we achieve the most perfect union.
Still others are attracted to the mystic yoga path called aṣṭāṇga, or the eightfold path, best outlined by Patanjali centuries after Krishna spoke the Bhagavad-Gita on the plains of Kurukshetra before the dawn of the Kali age.

The eight-fold path of Yoga appeals to many
The eight-fold path consists of systematic and definite steps to realization of our own spiritual energy as the atma within as a precursor to realization of the higher divinity above and beyond, called Paramatma.  

The essence of this yoga path was set forth in systematic form by the ancient sage Patanjali in his short but masterly work, the Yoga Sutras.
Paramahansa Yogananda has written: “Patanjali’s date is unknown, though many scholars assign him to the second century B.C. His renowned Yoga Sutras presents, in a series of brief aphorisms, the condensed essence of the exceedingly vast and intricate science of [Yoga] in such a beautiful, clear, and concise way that generations of scholars have acknowledged the Yoga Sutras as the foremost ancient work on yoga.”
The yoga system of Patanjali is known as the Eightfold Path, which leads to the final goal of God-realization. Krishna’s Bhagavad-Gita outlines the principles of Astanga yoga long before Patanjali in the sixth Chapter. This yoga is in part a mechanical meditative practice, which seeks to control the mind and senses and focuses with concentration on Paramatma (the Supersoul, the form of the Lord situated in the heart) as the goal.

Ashtanga-yoga culminates in samadhi, full consciousness of the individual soul as consciousness and the Supreme Soul as the Paramatma or supreme higher consciousness.

Christ in Samādhi
Patanjali’s Eightfold Path of Yoga sets forth eight principles. All of these principles are valuable in discovering the self and making progress on the path of self-realization. Westerners generally are exposed to the idea of asanas or different yoga postures.

Mystic Yogi

This is an important part of Patanjali’s system for fine-tuning body and mind, and so we may place it at the beginning of our list. The Eight principles of Ashtanga-yoga are as follows:
1. Asana: right posture.
2. Yama (avoidance of negative moral conduct): noninjury to others, truthfulness, nonstealing, continence, and noncovetousness
3. Niyama (appropriate moral conduct, following the rules and principles of dharma): purity of body and mind, contentment in all circumstances, self-discipline, self-study (contemplation), and devotion to God and guru.
4. Pranayama: Breath control and exercises. The control of prana, the subtle life currents in the body, is important in self-realization, since it improves mindfulness.
5. Pratyahara: Controlling the mind by withdrawing the senses from the sense objects.
6. Dharana: focused concentration; arresting the mind from drifting from one thing to the next. Krishna explains, “For him who has conquered the mind, the mind is the best of friends; but for one who has failed to do so, his very mind will be the greatest enemy.” bandhur ātmātmanas tasya yenātmaivātmanā jitaḥ anātmanas tu śatrutve vartetātmaiva śatru-vat|| बन्धुर् आत्मात्मनस् तस्य येनात्मैवात्मना जितः । अनात्मनस् तु शत्रुत्वे वर्तेतात्मैव शत्रु-वत्॥(BG 6.6)


In his purport to this verse Śrīla Prabhupāda points out: “The purpose of practicing eightfold yoga is to control the mind in order to make it a friend in discharging the human mission. Unless the mind is controlled, the practice of yoga (for show) is simply a waste of time. One who cannot control his mind lives always with the greatest enemy, and thus his life and its mission are spoiled. The constitutional position of the living entity is to carry out the order of the superior. As long as one's mind remains an unconquered enemy, one has to serve the dictations of lust, anger, avarice, illusion, etc.

"But when the mind is conquered, one voluntarily agrees to abide by the dictation of the Personality of Godhead, who is situated within the heart of everyone as Paramatma. Real yoga practice entails meeting the Paramatma within the heart and then following His dictation. For one who takes to Krsna consciousness directly, perfect surrender to the dictation of the Lord follows automatically.”



7. Dhyana: meditation, absorption in the vast perception of God.
8. Samadhi: superconscious experience of the individualized soul and its relationship with the Supersoul or Paramātma.

Samādhi has been defined by Krishna as follows: jñāna-vijñāna-tṛptātmā kūṭa-stho vijitendriyaḥ yukta ity ucyate yogī sama-loṣṭrāśma-kāñcanaḥ
ज्ञान-विज्ञान-तृप्तात्मा कूट-स्थो विजितेन्द्रियः युक्त इत्य् उच्यते योगी सम-लोष्ट्राश्म-काञ्चनः “For one who has conquered the mind, the Supersoul is already reached, for he has attained tranquility. To such a man happiness and distress, heat and cold, honor and dishonor are all the same.”



Śrīla Prabhupāda notes Krishna is defining the idea of samādhi here by his use of the world “sama”...”The effect of controlling the mind is that one automatically follows the dictation of the Paramatma or Supersoul. Because this transcendental position is at once achieved by one who is in Krsna consciousness, the devotee of the Lord is unaffected by the dualities of material existence, namely distress and happiness, cold and heat, etc. This state is practical samadhi, or absorption in the Supreme.”

Lord Shiva in Samādhi
It is important to note that the Patanjali tradition flows from the truths revealed in the Bhagavad-Gita and that Patanjali could hardly have defined samādhi differently from Krishna. If his followers have done so, they should return to the original meaning expressed in the sutras. In the next verse, Krishna further defines samādhi as a state of perfect intelligence, by which one sees everything in harmony:
suhṛn mitrāry-udāsīna madhyastha-dveṣya-bandhuṣu sādhuṣv api ca pāpeṣu sama-buddhir viśiṣyate
“A person is said to be still further advanced when he regards all—the honest well-wisher, friends and enemies, the envious, the pious, the sinner and those who are indifferent and impartial—with an equal mind.” (samabuddhi). Here, Krishna identifies harmonic vision with the perfect intelligence of samādhi, explaining that a perfectly realized soul sees everything on the spiritual platform.


If Patanjali’s eightfold path was defined somewhere between the Second and Fourth Century in India, it was inevitably influenced by the prevalence of Buddhism. It was not until after Shankaracharya’s Vedanta commentary in the 8th Century that Buddhism began losing popularity on the Indian Subcontinent.
Adi Shankar Acharya

Shankar Acharya sharply criticized the unscrupulous practices of monks, bringing about a reform in Buddhist monasteries. So, if Patanjali had written his sutras during the height of Buddhist influence in India, it may be enlightening to compare his eightfold path with that of the Buddhists.
While the yogic eightfold path seems to concentrate on personal enlightenment to the exclusion of real ethical considerations, the Buddha’s eightfold path appears to have a more universal application. It may be noted that neither of the two approaches attempt to incorporate “religious” considerations, but strive for universal truth.

Buddha, often considered an incarnation of Vishnu for the purpose of promoting the philosophy of nonviolence, discovers four universal truths.
Buddha begins by addressing the most important problems of human existence: birth, death, old age, and disease. Throughout our entire lifetime we are plagued by different miseries. There are problems beyond human control, for example, floods, drought, plague, and famine. There are problems caused by other people or even animals and mosquitoes. Then there are the miseries caused by our own body and mind. In short, there is suffering.

This is Buddha’s first “Noble Truth.” There is suffering. No one can dispute this.
His second idea is to analyse why there is suffering. His conclusion is that suffering is based on desire. As long as we want something we don’t have, we will be unhappy and suffer. His idea is beautiful in its simplicity. So far there is nothing intellectual or ontological about his curiosity. His question merely locates the central problem of our existence: Suffering. Then he asks, “Why do we suffer?” and concludes that the root of suffering is desire.
But the next question that comes up is “Where does desire come from?” If we suffer because we desire, then what is the origin of this desire? Is it possible to quench desire? Can desire be satiated? Buddha reaches the same conclusion as did the Rolling Stones: “I can’t get no satisfaction.”
Desire, according to Buddha, seems to be based on Ego. As long as there is an “I” there must be desire. Never mind the ontological nature of the soul. We don’t seem to be in a position to grasp that at this point. But we can say that the desire caused by Ego is at the heart of our suffering. This is his third Noble truth: Ego causes desire.

So Buddha sets out to see how Ego can be dealt with. His plan for dealing with Ego is called the “Path.” And this is his fourth Noble truth: the “path” to release the Ego.
Now, Buddhism tends towards nihilism and voidism. Nirvana is an interesting word in Sanskrit. Nir means “not” or Nothing. Vana means “forest” and by extension any inhabitable place. So Nirvana really means “Nowhere.” It was Samuel Butler who turned Utopia on its head by writing his satire Erewhon, which is Nowhere spelled backwords. The very idea of Buddhism is to get us to Nowhere, nirvana, since anywhere must be better than this world of suffering and loss.
But leaving aside this negative aspect of Buddhist philosophy, there is something integral about Buddha’s ideas that have given comfort to humanity for 25 centuries. Patanjali liked the eightfold path enough that he adopted it in his own Yoga system. Did Patanjali borrow the eightfold path from Buddha? Or did Buddha steal the eightfold path from Krishna. Perhaps he read the Bhagavad-Gita in secret and plagiarized Krishna, hoping that he would never be discovered. Or, then again, isn’t it possible that there is a universal truth embedded in the eight-fold path, one that we might profit by studying.
If Krishna, Buddha, and Patanjali forwarded the same idea with a slightly different focus, perhaps we might benefit by looking more closely at the eightfold path.
Buddha claims that there are four important ideas or truths that we must take as being axiomatic:
1. There is suffering.
2. Suffering is caused by desire.
3. Desire flows from the Ego.
4. We must then investigate how to escape Ego using the 8-fold path.
So far so good. There may be different approaches to resolving the problem of Ego, depending on our sense of ontology, that is to say, “who we are.”
But let’s take a closer look: Having established his Four Noble Truths, Buddha goes on to describe his process, his “eight-fold path” to dissolve the ego and reach nirvana.
Buddha’s eightfold path may be divided into 3 parts: perspective, action, and mindfulness.
Perspective is the beginning. The first step on the path is to begin to understand the ego, to do some self-analysis and introspection. Buddha calls this first step “Right vision.” In Sanskrit this is called samyak drishti. The word samyak is often translated as “right,” so Right Vision.
But samyak also means “complete,” as in saṅkirtan, which means “complete kirtan.” Samyak carries the sense of total, complete, wholistic. And dristhi or darshan means “vision, perspective, point of view, philosophy.
Before setting out on the path to enlightenment, on should have the proper perspective, a complete vision of the gestalt or total reality. If one sees reality with spiritual vision, one’s action, speech and thinking will flow in harmony with this awareness of reality.
The correct perspective allows us to act in proper adjustment. Buddha asks us to keep in mind that the world is temporary. That death is imminent. The temporal nature of reality and the imminence of death should lead us toward the truth about the self. Buddha understands that by giving up attachment to material things we lose desire for them and so become free from suffering.
Lord Buddha calls the second step on the path samyak samkalpa, which is generally taken to mean Right Intention. saṅkalpa means determination, or one’s proper conviction after due diligence. Complete or firm determination. This may be considered a precursor to faith: Proper intention, purity of conviction. One is determined to reach freedom from false ego and selfishness, acting with compassion and benevolence to reach the goal.
The third step on the eightfold path brings us into practice. If the first two ideas have to do with perspective and conviction, the third has to do with action.
The third step on the eightfold path is called “Right Speech.” samyak vac. Again samyak may be translated as perfect. So Perfect Speech. This is not the same as the perfect tense in English.
Perfect Speech means freedom from gossip and fault-finding. You might define it as a rigorous distance from false and hurtful speech and gossip: avoid speech that offends; speak the truth. Speak sweetly. Avoid speaking harsh truths that offend. Be honest. There is an echo of Buddha’s teaching in Rupa Goswami’s Upadeshamrita where he calls for his followers to control the urge to speak vāco vegaṁ manasaḥ krodha-vegaṁ jihvā-vegam udaropastha-vegam etān vegān yo viṣaheta dhīraḥ sarvām apīmāṁ pṛthivīṁ sa śiṣyāt.
वाचो वेगं मनसः क्रोध-वेगं जिह्वा-वेगम् उदरोपस्थ-वेगम् एतान् वेगान् यो विषहेत धीरः सर्वाम् अपीमां पृथिवीं स शिष्यात्.
“One who can control the forces of speech, mind, anger, belly, tongue and genitals is known as a gosvāmī and is competent to accept disciples all over the world.” Upadeshamrita 1, (Nectar of Instruction, Rupa Goswami.)


Buddha tells us to control our speech, to speak carefully and completely: Samyak vak . This principle perhaps did not originate with Buddha thousands of years ago, but it has been accepted as a valuable truth and incorporated into the monastic traditions of spiritual communities wherever people practice meditation and prayer. An extreme example would be the Trappist monks who follow a strict version of the vows of silence as set down in the Rule of St. Benedict.
The practical aspects of the eightfold path begin with speech and continue with action. Buddha identifies three different aspects of action: Action itself, Livelihood, and Sincere Effort.
Action means acting appropriately. Since suffering is the basic truth of reality, we should not cause more suffering. Any suffering we create will come back to us as the law of karma. Therefore we must act appropriately in avoiding all kinds of violence to others including stealing which is violence against property. Murder and meat-eating are other forms of violence. Violence creates a negative karmic reaction and upsets the balanced life that a truth-seeker strives for. By the same token one must avoid immoral conduct such as adultery, fornication, prostitution, and all forms of sexual misconduct. Intoxication ruins the capacity for proper vision and intention and must be forsaken. Drug addiction and drunkenness it all its forms destroys the prospects for self-realization. Gambling agitates the mind as well. Sharp and ruinous business practices are also actions to be avoided. Acting appropriately is called Right Action.
The 5th step is Right Livelihood. Avoiding negative action is insufficient to bring about a balanced life of harmony, according to the teachings of the Buddha. One must have a proper occupation. This includes education and proper thinking. By living a balanced life one reduces egotism. Unsuitable occupations include working as a butcher or a wine merchant. Suitable occupations are honest and nonviolent and contribute something to society. Right Livelihood means living according to your principles by accepting a proper occupation. These are universally accepted principles for living.
The fifth step on the eightfold path is called Right Effort, samyak vyayam. Vyayam means “exercise” If we take this in the sense of physical exercise, then this corresponds to the asana part of the eightfold yoga path of Patanjali. But here, exercise is not only physical but mental and refers to the proper exercise of the above principles.
So far we have seen certain parallels with Patanjali’s eightfold path. Yama and Niyama or accepting what is favorable rules and regulations and rejecting unfavorable behavior are reflected in Buddha’s ideas about practical behavior and action. Dharana and Dhyana correspond to meditation and conduct. Buddha lays no emphasis on Pranayama as such, but Pranayama breathing exercises are practiced in many Buddhist circles. Pratyahara or properly controlling the mind, giving up negative ideas also corresponds to some extent to this concept of proper exercise, which flows through the sixth step, called Right Effort.
The Sixth step is called Right Effort or pro-active vigilance against unwholesome mental thoughts, evil ideas and attitudes, mental vices such as lust, greed, sloth, pride, illusion, envy, racism, nationalism, materialism, sensualism, and other forms of egoism.
Having contemplated different aspects of action both subtle and gross, in speech and deed, Buddha moves on to consider the nature of the mind. The 7th step on the eightfold path is called samyak smrti. In Sanskrit smrti means “memory.”
For Buddhists, smriti means to maintain a proper consciousness of body, mind, and spirit, remembering the four noble truths and what has been learned by following the eight-fold path. By remembering the imminence of death and the impermanence of the world followers of Buddha’s path try to maintain proper adjustment.
Followers of Krishna consciousness, Vaishnavas, find this to be an incomplete version of rememberance. After all, Buddha is calling for samyak smriti or total recall.
What then is the best smrti? The best remembrance is to remember Krishna. While Buddha advises his followers to follow the eightfold path to enlightenment, Vaishnavas have a nine-fold path of surrender:
śrī-prahrāda uvāca śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇaṁ pāda-sevanam arcanaṁ vandanaṁ dāsyaṁ sakhyam ātma-nivedanam iti puṁsārpitā viṣṇau bhaktiś cen nava-lakṣaṇā kriyeta bhagavaty addhā tan manye ’dhītam uttamam
श्री-प्रह्राद उवाच श्रवणं कीर्तनं विष्णोः स्मरणं पाद-सेवनम् अर्चनं वन्दनं दास्यं सख्यम् आत्म निवेदनम् इति पुंसार्पिता विष्णौ भक्तिश् चेन् नव-लक्षणा क्रियेत भगवत्य् अद्धा तन् मन्ये ’धीतम् उत्तमम्
Prahlāda Mahārāja said: Hearing and chanting about the transcendental holy name, form, qualities, paraphernalia and pastimes of Lord Viṣṇu, remembering them, serving the lotus feet of the Lord, offering the Lord respectful worship with sixteen types of paraphernalia, offering prayers to the Lord, becoming His servant, considering the Lord one’s best friend, and surrendering everything unto Him (in other words, serving Him with the body, mind and words)—these nine processes are accepted as pure devotional service. One who has dedicated his life to the service of Kṛṣṇa through these nine methods should be understood to be the most learned person, for he has acquired complete knowledge.
(SB 7.5.23-24 Śrīla Prabhupāda)
Smaranam or Smriti remembrance is an important aspect of surrender. Note here that the 9 different kinds of surrender are not a means towards an ends as are the eightfold steps of Buddha’s enlightenment. It is not that by following the different processes of surrender that we gain freedom from misery. The processes of surrender are not a means towards an ends but an ends in themselves. Surrender is its own reward. The goal of bhakti is love. Love is its own reward.
In any case, smaranam, or remembrance, according to the Vaishnavas is remembrance of God, not of the misery and suffering of this world or the need to destroy the ego. In this sense there is a big difference between Buddha’s path and Vaishnava faith.
How is remembrance achieved? This may be done through repetition of the mantra while remembering its inner sense. Guru has given us the mantra as a means to remember Krishna. By constantly meditating on the mantra we come into connection with that memory. REmembering Krishna is real samyak smrti, that is, proper memory.
The next step in Buddha’s eight-fold path is samādhi, which according to his analysis is perfect concentration or mindfulness, enlightenment.
Vaishnavas have a different perspective on samādhi, one which is at variance as well with that of Patanjali. The Vaishnava acharyas consider that one who is well-established in remembrance of Krishna enters into the divine domain. His situation there in samyak smrti, as one who never forgets the Lord, is called samadhi. Established in complete remembrance or samyak smrti, the devotee who has realized his position as an eternal servitor of divinity realizes complete bliss. This is samyak or complete samādhi according to the Vaishnava Acharyas.
As we have seen there are certain parallels between the ancient system of ashtanga yoga as outlined by Patanjali and the eight-fold approach to enlightenment as outlined by Lord Buddha.
These principles adhere to a certain set of truths that cannot be denied, insofar as they have guided the lives of spiritual aspirants in various countries over a period of thousands of years.
The special distinction held by the Vaishnava way of life is to incorporate these ideas into the daily life of sadhakas who follow the guidelines laid out by guru in the line of Śrī Caitanya. The advice that has been followed by both yogis and practicioners of Buddhas has been useful in focusing the mind, restraining the lower impulses and guiding ethical and practical behavior in the search for enlightenment.
Where Buddha stressed a search for truth, Shankar and Patanjali aimed higher at eternal spiritual realization. The Vaishnava contribution is the Search for Shri Krishna, the search for eternal bliss in a loving relationship with God, Krishna that can be attained not only by following the principles of an eight-fold path, but through the mercy of guru and Krishna.
But while we hold out for the mercy of guru and Krishna like the chataka bird who stretches his beak out to the heavens for rain, we do not deny the practice of ethical spiritual principles. The idea of Right Thinking, Right Action, and Right Speech while forwarded milennium ago by Buddha is still useful today. The principles of compassion and nonviolence are not absolutes: Divine mercy is the highest absolute. But in the search for personal realization following the above principles is good advice for any spiritual aspirant. One must strictly adhere to these fundamental principles to purify the body, mind, and spirit in the search for Sri Krishna.



Thursday, August 24, 2017

Make America Great Again


The "Greatness" of Civilizations




A recent experience I had traveling got me thinking about the nature of greatness and civilization.
I was standing in line at passport control in the Los Angeles airport last year when I was overcome with a wave of nostalgia, triggered by the way the afternoon light came through the windows. Something about the sound and smells. I was home. I was born and grew up in L.A., not far from the airport. As a teenager I used to drive out to the airport and park and watch the planes come in.
The airport has changed a lot over the years. The architecture used to be late Tomorrowland with themes borrowed from Walt Disney’s idea of the future. Now it’s as drab as anywhere else, with extra security areas. I was in the line for the robots.


A burly black man in uniform directed me to my personal robot. I was to place my passport on the scanner and wait until it scanned my retina and took my photo. The robot read the information embedded on the microchip in my passport and decided that I could be admitted into the United States. It spat out a ticket.
I joined the next line. Now I remembered this place. I used to stand in this very spot years ago distributing books. I remembered the pillars and the chewing gum gray of the concrete floor. I would stop businessmen on the shuttle flight from San Diego, greeting them with “Good Morning Sir! Where you coming in from?” I would show them the Bhagavad-Gita and talk about the need for a spiritual life guided by the ancient wisdom traditions. In those days, first amendment rights of free speech were guaranteed in public places like airports. I had some interesting conversations with passengers, even meeting celebrities like Jack Lemmon, Neil Young, Wilt Chamberlain, and Rod Stewart.
More often then not the businessmen on the flight would ignore me and continue on with a blank stare. Not interested. But as I approached the officer who guarded my way home, I noticed the “Make America Great Again” coffee cup on his desk and remembered a particular conversation. In this exact spot back in the 70s I met an unusual man who stopped to talk with me for a few moments about the Bhagavad-Gita and the meaning of life. As the passengers in front of me edged forward nervously I reflected on our talk.
“Where you coming in from, sir?” I said with a smile, dressed in a three-piece suit and holding a Bhagavad-Gita.
“San Diego, sir. Is there some problem?”
“Well, sir, the problem is that while everyone is dying, no one believes that they’re going to die,” I said, handing him a copy of the Bhagavad-Gita As It Is, translated by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada.
“Yes, indeed,” the man said, looking at the book.
Book Distribution
“It’s a promotion we’re doing here at the airport,” I said, reciting my spiel. “Everyone’s into it. This popular translation of an ancient classic is taking the country by storm.”
He was a thoughtful man, well-dressed, a bit short, glasses, olive complexion in his late 30s. Possibly European.
“I see. How much are you asking?”
“See, we’re all stuck in the cycle of repeated birth and death--we can’t get off the wheel of karma. This book explains how, through the process of bhakti-yoga or divine live, we can become liberated from the world of struggle and strife.”
“Is that so?” he said, paging through the illustrations.
“These are the ancient wisdom teachings from the greatest civilization,” I said, continuing with my pitch. He looked up and peered at me over his glasses.
“Any donation is acceptable. Most people are giving 10 dollars today.”
“The greatest civilization?” He said. “Well, I come from the greatest civilization, and I have never heard of this book. I tell you what, if you can guess where I’m from I’ll buy your book.”
“Well,” I said, “Some people would say that Queen Victoria had the greatest civilization the world has ever seen, since during her reign the sun never set on the British Empire. But you don’t seem British to me.”
“You’re right there sir,” the man said with a smile, exposing a gold tooth.
“And Los Angeles here was once part of Aztlan, the great Meso-American civilization the Mayans and Aztecs,” I said studying his eyes for a reaction, “But I don’t think you’re from around here.”
“Very good, sir. Go on.”
“Well, the Greeks dominated the ancient world with their black ships and with Alexander the Great conquered the world as far as the Hindu Kush. But you don’t seem Greek.”
“Not at all,” he laughed.
“On the other hand, the Egyptians raised pyramids out of the desert near Cairo.” His eyes brightened. I was onto him. “King Tutankhamen played with toy airplanes and fine golden ornaments over 3,000 years before us. I’d have to say you’re from Egypt.”

“Well done, sir. I’ll take your book.” He fished in his wallet for a ten-dollar bill. “I’m sure it will make for a very enlightening read.” He opened his briefcase and carefully put the Bhagavad-Gita inside. And with that he walked away from the concourse and my memory.
The line moved and jolted me out of my memory. That was long ago. No one was allowed to distribute books in this part of the airport anymore. I think the only place to buy books was in the airport book store. Back in the 1970s we weren’t the only ones to sell our literature in the airport. There were also the Black Muslims of Elijah Muhammed who sold a newspaper called “Muhammed Speaks.” There were a lot of first amendment groups expressing free speech back then. The high security everywhere reminded me that those days are gone now. One needs to be careful about what is said, these days. Times have changed.
Watch what you say.
It was my turn. I had reached the uniformed man with the “Make America Great Again” coffee cup. He scanned my ticket and looked me in the eye. “What’s the purpose of your visit?” he asked.
I remembered that once when we crossed the border from Denmark into Sweden, my friend Bhakti Abhay Narayan Maharaja was asked the same question. We had driven from the Frankfurt airport to Helsingore, Denmark, home of Hamlet’s castle. We drove onto a huge ferry-boat that took us across the sea to Sweden.
When the guard asked him why he was entering Sweden, Narayan Maharaja became indignant. “This is my country,” he said. “How can you ask me that?!” But that was back in the 1980s. Now it is more prudent to mind one’s business and answer the questions.
“The purpose of my visit?” I said, glancing at the “Make America Great Again” coffee cup and the grim visage of the border guard who stood on the spot where I had once mused about the greatness of civilization. “I’m here to see my brother.”
“You have an address here in Los Angeles?”





“It’s here on the form,” I said, handing him the piece of paper.
He stamped me in.
“Welcome to the United States,” he said.
“Thanks.” I said, moving on to the baggage claim and customs check, where the proud inspectors of Immigrations and Customs would X-ray my ukulele for explosives.

As I exited passport control, I thought back on my conversation with my friend from Egypt. It had struck me then, and still does, that the essence of a great civilization sometimes vanishes, leaving behind only a trace.
The topless towers of Ilium or the glory that was Rome exist only in ancient poetry.
I have known language professors who became enamored of the Greek civilization; who traveled to Athens only to find disappointment. Nothing of the great civilization of Plato and Socrates of Homer, of Odysseus and Agamemnon lives in the ruins of the debased Greek spoken today in the markets of Athens and Sparta.

Tourists who visit the Great Pyramids of Giza and the Sphinx of Cheops are often shocked. Having paid thousands of dollars for a tour of great civilization, they find to their chagrin that these monuments to ancient culture are situated in a disaster zone. My Egyptian amigo was proud of the fact that the pyramids, one of the great wonders of the world, were built between 2560–2540 BC, and that the Great Pyramid of Giza was for more than 3,800 years, the Great Pyramid of Giza was the tallest man made structure in the world. Today, the Great Sphinx faces the stink and squalor of the filthy slums of Giza, called Nazlet al-Simman. From his position near the Great Pyramid, the Sphinx overlooks a Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant as if posing questions about the price of a bucket of wings.

Agressive hawkers push cheap plastic trinkets on visitors, while tour guides sell tours on horse-back and camel and beggars demand baksheesh. Visitors looking for the grandeur of a lost civilization report a disgusting and disappointing experience. Tourists find ruins disconnected from the grandeur of ancient Egypt.
And if this disconnect is a characteristic of Greece and Egypt, what of India? Those who read the Bhagavad-Gita deeply know that the struggle that Arjuna faced was not, in the higher sense, a political struggle. The Battle of Kurukshetra was not fought merely as a conflict between the ancient kings of India. Arjuna’s battle is also representative of our own inner struggle. The message of the Bhagavad-Gita, as I tried to explain to my Egyptian friend long ago, is universal.
We are not merely adherents to an “Indian lifestyle.” Those who choose to dive deep into the message of the Gita are interested in its universal message. The Bhagavad-Gita takes up the issue of consciousness. It contemplates both subjective and objective experience, time and the world, the nature of action and inaction as seen in the subtle idea of karma. These ideas have a universal application. They have nothing to do with incense, saris, or the kind of tiara worn by the Maharaj of Maharastra.
India today is as degraded and corrupt as the slums of Cairo. Its once great language vitiated, its proud heritage damaged and demeaned. Just as Egypt is no longer the Egypt of the Pharoah and Greece is no longer the Greece of Homer, India is no longer the country of Vyāsa, of Krishna, and of Buddha.
Political movements to “Make India Great Again,” notwithstanding, India is no longer the India of the Bhagavad-Gita, just as Greece is no longer the Greece of the Iliad and the Odyssey and today’s Spain has little to do with the Spain celebrated by Cervantes in the Quixote.
But this does not mean that the message of the Bhagavad-Gita is less universal. Nationalist movements wherever they are celebrated have more to do with political ends than with spiritual ones. As Śrīdhar Mahārāja used to say, “Society Consciousnes and God Consciousness are always coming in clash.”
Nationalist movements to restore the greatness of particular countries are usually only methods used by cynical politicians to distract their citizens from more pressing problems of poverty and education. Indian politicians who wish to restore the glory of the past may be avoiding the problems of the present. They may wish to exploit the greatness of the Bhagavad-Gita to advance a political agenda.
But the Bhagavad-Gita resists such a facile interpretation, just as it has withstood the test of time. This is because its universal message touches on the true character of dharma and the nature of the human soul.
As the customs man returned my ukulele, now irradiated by the finest technology, I nodded thanks and went on my way, to see if America was truly becoming “Great” again.





Monday, August 21, 2017

Nazis are not funny


“My father was a reformed Jew. In fact he was so reformed he was a Nazi."
--Woody Allen
WHY NAZIS ARE NOT FUNNY
Most of you are probably not old enough to remember this, but there was a TV show back in the 1960s called Hogan’s Heroes. It was the story of American soldiers and French resistance fighters who ran a covert resistance operation out of a prison camp behind German lines.

Sgt. Schultz, Hogan, Colonel Klink

The concentration camp officer was Colonel Klink played by Werner Klemperer, who lampooned the idea of a cultivated German officer. Bob Crane, and ex-DJ was Hogan. Every week a crew of brilliant comedians skewered the foibles of the Germans, especially Col. Klink and his lovable comic sidekick Sgt. Schultz whose big laugh line was “I know nothing! Nothing!”
The show was hilarious. Every week my brothers and I would gather around the TV for a new episode. Even my mother watched the show. It turned out she had a sentimental connection. The stereo typical French guy “LeBeau” was played by a talented French song and dance man, Robert Clary. My mother later confessed that she had dated him back in the 1950s. Robert Clary was a short guy who could do a brilliant Jerry Lewis impression.
Hogan’s heroes was hysterical not because Nazis are funny, but for how it made fun of the Nazis and their “just following orders” mentality. The Nazis are not funny.
My father worked in network TV at the time. He an executive producer on Batman and a lot of other network shows. He never watched Hogan’s Heroes with us.
My father had been in the French Navy, where he saw action at Dunkirk. His show business career started during the war when he made propaganda broadcasts for the BBC after the French Navy had been destroyed by the Germans at Dunkirk.
Evacuation of Dunkirk

Dunkirk was not funny. When the armies of the Nazis swept through the neutral country of Belgium the French Navy was stranded on the beach along with some 300,000 or so English soldiers. My father was not among those saved by the brave fishing schooners of operation Dynamo. He was captured on the beach and held prisoner in a concentration camp.
When the prisoners were allowed a game of football one day my father and his friend Renée ran down the beach chasing the ball into the weeds and barbed wire. With the help of Renée my father jumped the barbed wire. In the chaos of the football game he wasn’t missed. He managed to escape to England on a fishing boat run by the resistance. He never watched Hogan’s heroes with us. For him, the Nazis just weren’t funny.
In a recent competition for the funniest commercial in Europe, one of the judges commented that many of the German commercials were somehow flat. There is a stereotype about the Germans that they’re just not funny, or have no sense of humor. It’s an interesting point.


It may be true. I can’t think of any funny Germans off the top of my head.
The lack of sense of humor may have something to do with the fact that during the second world war all the funny people were either killed, deported, or exiled.
I understand that some people have an ax to grind about the Rothschilds and so on. But I think I could make a pretty good case that the funniest people in the world are Jewish.
The Marx Brothers, arguably the funniest people, were Jewish. Without batting an eye or looking it up on Google, I can tell you that the funniest writers of the 20th century were Carl Reiner, Mel Brooks, Woody Allen, and Neil Simon. All Jewish. They wrote for the Sid Caesar show, Johnny Carson, and later for movies and Broadway plays. Funny people like Jackie Mason, Mort Sahl, Lenny Bruce, and Billy Crystal practically invented stand-up comedy. They were all Jewish.

The Marx Brothers

During the second world war numerous composers artists, musicians, thinkers, scientists, philosophers, intellectuals, and funny people were rounded up for extermination by the Nazis. Based on Hitler’s racial theories, the Nazis had a four point program for Jews: registration, deportation, concentration, and extermination.
They rendered into so the greatest composers and poets of their day. Maybe somewhere along the line, they lost their sense of humor. What they did wasn’t really funny. Maybe if they hadn’t deported and exterminated an entire generation of funny people, the Germans would have a better sense of humor today. But German commercials today are just not funny. They have little sense of humor because they gassed the funny people and made them into bars of soap. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2982639/Bar-soap-fat-Jewish-Holocaust-victims-removed-eBay-Dutch-owner-sale.html
Bar of Soap made from human fat by Nazis

Nazis are not funny. The KKK is not a joke. Guys marching with tiki torches and swastikas screaming racist and anti-Semitic slogans are not funny. It’s time to take them seriously.
Young people today lack the tools to see this point. They have no sense of history. The purpose of television and social media is not to educate, but to make them forget, to lull people into a false sense of security. Hypnotized by the screen in front of them, they forget the past and lose consciousness about the future. The most wonderful thing is not the cell phone in your hand; the most wonderful thing is the fact that everyone is going to die but no one believes he is going to die. After all if we believed that death was imminent, we might change our behavior.
Actions have Consequences
We might consider that compassion is an important value. Violence and racism sin against compassion. The law of karma, of action and reaction, means that our sins will certainly follow us after our death. Hedonism and selfishness are not appropriate values in a civilized society. And yet, hypnotized by handheld screens, and caught up in a web of social networks, young people are easy prey to the consumer society which demands that they forget the past and disregard the future. In a place where only immediate pleasure is valued, it is easy to forget what the Nazis stand for and what the Nazis did.
Those who remember history are naturally nervous about Nazi-ism. They don’t think Nazis are funny. My father was not a Jew. But since the Nazi-led German soldiers branded his arm with the name and number of his prison registration, he didn’t think the Nazis were funny either.
Nazis are clever enough that they don’t begin by calling for the extermination of a race. They began with ridicule. They begin by ridiculing immigrants and people who have different beliefs or different skin colors. In the United States, they begin with the Terrorists. Then they go after the Muslims. After the terrorists and the Muslims it’s the Mexicans. Pretty soon they focus on inner-city crime, the drug war, welfare mothers and juvenile delinquents.
As it turns out, law enforcement for the war on crime tends to focus on people of color and racial discrimination. Organizations formed to protect the rights of minorities are singled out for attack. In the end it becomes clear that the same power structure is going after minority religions, people of color, immigrants, foreigners, and Jews. The erosion of personal liberty and rights are rationalized by the need for national security. Wasn’t that the program of the Nazis?

As a member of a minority religion--I am a Hare Krishna devotee--I am concerned about the tendency towards Nazi ideas and racial theories now sweeping the United States. I think it is time to speak out. I am reminded of Martin Niemöller, a Protestant minister during the 1940s. Niemöller had qualms about the Nazi program, but he didn't speak out until it was too late.
Niemöller is perhaps best remembered for the quotation:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
It's dangerous to speak out. Speech has consequences. We speak out at our own peril. When I was a kid in school, the Americans were busy napalming children in Vietnam. For those of you unfamiliar with Napalm, it was a solid form of gasoline developed by Dow chemical. The gasoline jelly was dropped along with incendiary devices on military targets in Vietnam as part of the bombing campaign called "Rolling Thunder." When burning gasoline jelly was dropped on your skin, there was no way to put it out. You would run around shocked by the flames that consumed you while your friends tried to put you out. But the jelly would stick to your skin and the gasoline fire resisted water.


Most people didn't speak out against the Vietnam War. Such talk undermined our patriotic effort to spread democracy and save the world. Anyway, it didn't matter if a few children were burned, they were "collateral damage." After all, they were inferior human beings who didn't know what was good for them, or even worse, they were "commies." Anyone who said otherwise was a "commie sympathizer: or worse, a "hippie".
At that time the anti-war people embraced a "commie"poet named Yevgeny Yevtushenko. He wrote a poem about the Nazi atrocities at a place called Babi Yar.


[Translator's note:
Yevgeni Yevtushenko’s poem, written to expose the inhumanity of Babi Yar, and the subsequent injustice of the government’s refusal to raise a monument to the thousands of Jews executed there by the Nazi troops, produced a tremendous effect in Russia. I learned this poem by heart when I was very young, without understanding anything except the basic ideas. Recently, I saw a copy of it, and remembered. I still cannot read it without tears.” --Benjamin Okopnik ]
BABI YAR
By Yevgeni Yevtushenko
Translated by Benjamin Okopnik, 10/96
No monument stands over Babi Yar.
A steep cliff only, like the rudest headstone.
I am afraid.
Today, I am as old
As the entire Jewish race itself.
I see myself an ancient Israelite.
I wander o’er the roads of ancient Egypt
And here, upon the cross, I perish, tortured
And even now, I bear the marks of nails.
It seems to me that Dreyfus is myself. *1*
The Philistines betrayed me – and now judge.
I’m in a cage. Surrounded and trapped,
I’m persecuted, spat on, slandered, and
The dainty dollies in their Brussels frills
Squeal, as they stab umbrellas at my face.
I see myself a boy in Belostok *2*
Blood spills, and runs upon the floors,
The chiefs of bar and pub rage unimpeded
And reek of vodka and of onion, half and half.
I’m thrown back by a boot, I have no strength left,
In vain I beg the rabble of pogrom,
To jeers of “Kill the Jews, and save our Russia!”
My mother’s being beaten by a clerk.
O, Russia of my heart, I know that you
Are international, by inner nature.
But often those whose hands are steeped in filth
Abused your purest name, in name of hatred.
I know the kindness of my native land.
How vile, that without the slightest quiver
The antisemites have proclaimed themselves
The “Union of the Russian People!”
It seems to me that I am Anna Frank,
Transparent, as the thinnest branch in April,
And I’m in love, and have no need of phrases,
But only that we gaze into each other’s eyes.
How little one can see, or even sense!
Leaves are forbidden, so is sky,
But much is still allowed – very gently
In darkened rooms each other to embrace.
-“They come!”
-“No, fear not – those are sounds
Of spring itself. She’s coming soon.
Quickly, your lips!”
-“They break the door!”
-“No, river ice is breaking…”
Wild grasses rustle over Babi Yar,
The trees look sternly, as if passing judgement.
Here, silently, all screams, and, hat in hand,
I feel my hair changing shade to gray.
And I myself, like one long soundless scream
Above the thousands of thousands interred,
I’m every old man executed here,
As I am every child murdered here.
No fiber of my body will forget this.
May “Internationale” thunder and ring *3*
When, for all time, is buried and forgotten
The last of antisemites on this earth.
There is no Jewish blood that’s blood of mine,
But, hated with a passion that’s corrosive
Am I by antisemites like a Jew.
And that is why I call myself a Russian!
Бабий Яр
Над Бабьим Яром памятников нет.
Крутой обрыв, как грубое надгробье.
Мне страшно.
Мне сегодня столько лет,
как самому еврейскому народу.

Мне кажется сейчас -
я иудей.
Вот я бреду по древнему Египту.
А вот я, на кресте распятый, гибну,
и до сих пор на мне - следы гвоздей.
Мне кажется, что Дрейфус -
это я.
Мещанство -
мой доносчик и судья.
Я за решеткой.
Я попал в кольцо.
Затравленный,
оплеванный,
оболганный.
И дамочки с брюссельскими оборками,
визжа, зонтами тычут мне в лицо.
Мне кажется -
я мальчик в Белостоке.
Кровь льется, растекаясь по полам.
Бесчинствуют вожди трактирной стойки
и пахнут водкой с луком пополам.
Я, сапогом отброшенный, бессилен.
Напрасно я погромщиков молю.
Под гогот:
'Бей жидов, спасай Россию!' -
насилует лабазник мать мою.
О, русский мой народ! -
Я знаю -
ты
По сущности интернационален.
Но часто те, чьи руки нечисты,
твоим чистейшим именем бряцали.
Я знаю доброту твоей земли.
Как подло,
что, и жилочкой не дрогнув,
антисемиты пышно нарекли
себя "Союзом русского народа"!
Мне кажется -
я - это Анна Франк,
прозрачная,
как веточка в апреле.
И я люблю.
И мне не надо фраз.
Мне надо,
чтоб друг в друга мы смотрели.
Как мало можно видеть,
обонять!
Нельзя нам листьев
и нельзя нам неба.
Но можно очень много -
это нежно
друг друга в темной комнате обнять.
Сюда идут?
Не бойся - это гулы
самой весны -
она сюда идет.
Иди ко мне.
Дай мне скорее губы.
Ломают дверь?
Нет - это ледоход...
Над Бабьим Яром шелест диких трав.
Деревья смотрят грозно,
по-судейски.
Все молча здесь кричит,
и, шапку сняв,
я чувствую,
как медленно седею.
И сам я,
как сплошной беззвучный крик,
над тысячами тысяч погребенных.
Я -
каждый здесь расстрелянный старик.
Я -
каждый здесь расстрелянный ребенок.
Ничто во мне
про это не забудет!
«Интернационал»
пусть прогремит,
когда навеки похоронен будет
последний на земле антисемит.
Еврейской крови нет в крови моей.
Но ненавистен злобой заскорузлой
я всем антисемитам,
как еврей,
и потому -
я настоящий русский!
1961
Евгений Евтушенко. Мое самое-самое. Москва, Изд-во АО "ХГС" 1995.

Nazi SS Women at Babi Yar

**************************************************
NOTES
—–1 – Alfred Dreyfus was a French officer, unfairly dismissed from service in 1894 due to trumped-up charges prompted by anti- Semitism.
2 – Belostok: the site of the first and most violent pogroms, the Russian version of KristallNacht.
3 – “Internationale”: The Soviet national anthem.